mRNA and new cancers (John Campbell)

Mad, incompetent or negligent, with professor Angus Dalgleish.



[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 17, 2026.]

Am I paranoid - you decide (John Campbell)

John Campbell looking at the recent medical conference held in Australia with many speakers airing information about the pandemic and the damage caused by the experimental jabs. This short clip looks at material presented by Prof. Charlie Teo who noticed an increase in neurological problems subsequent to the jabs.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 16, 2026.]

Ancient Egyptian Artifacts Petrie Could Not Explain (History Drops)

Ancient Egyptian Artifacts Petrie could not explain. Ben Van Kerkwyk along with Brothers of Serpent, in this recent podcast, discuss the incredibe amount of artifacts that Flinders Petrie could not explain from an engineering or archeological point of view. The heavy limestone erosion is also a huge sign that the timeline could not be correct and showed flaws!



[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 15, 2026.]

Suppressing the Victims of Covid: Why Won't Canadian Media Talk About the Allison Inquiry? (Viva Frei)

Mainstream media in Canada refuses to attend these hearings. There's an establishment blackout on the truth. 

Ordinary people were tricked and coerced into taking the experimental Covid shots and many ended up with injuries or died. The authorities don't want to know about what they did. How ordinary people have been treated is a disgrace. 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 14, 2026.]

Architects and Engineers: Solving the Mystery of Building 7 - w/ Ed Asner (RECAP)

Building 7 collapsed at freefall speed on the afternoon of the 911 attacks after bombs (undoubtedly controlled demolition charges) were set off in the building. There is no physical way for the building to have collapsed, as if there were nothing but air resistance, without the use of explosives. The official NIST model that tried to explain what happened failed to model this reality.

There were also witnesses to the bombs going off inside this building:

Two Barry Jennings Interviews (WABC-TV, 2001 / LTW, 2007)


[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 12, 2026.]

RECAP: Jonathan Cole - 9/11 Experiments: Eliminate the Impossible - AE911Truth.org

When you have competing hypotheses (expert vs expert) you can do an experiment to prove who is right. Two quotes. "Experiment is the final arbiter of competing hypotheses" and "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

The clip is 14 minutes, refuting the official story and debunking the so called debunkers. Either basic fundamental scientific principles are wrong or the official story is a lie in terms of this forensic material. The most important thing here is ANYONE can check this evidence for themselves and juxtapose it to the official narrative.

The only real issue is one's psychological aptitude when it comes to dealing with 'difficult' subjects and one's political/economic position which makes people reluctant to speak out - people speaking out may, and have, lost their jobs, or suffered varying levels of ostracisation and harassment.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 12, 2026.]

RECAP: Structural Engineer Roland Angle, P.E., delivers WTC FACTS: Building 7 (AE911Truth)

Earlier this year, AE911Truth's Roland Angle, P. E., spoke at two separate meetings of Stand Up for Idaho — a political organization of Idaho citizens that advocates on behalf of issues reflecting the concerns of most rural areas in middle America.

The first presentation above, which took place on February 23rd, focused on World Trade Center 7, and the second, on March 1st, was centered around the Twin Towers.



The official NIST explanation for the collapse of WTC7 is a pack of lies. Data within their OWN report shows that what they claim is impossible. They massively contradict themselves. You only have to spend a few minutes (20mins out of a 1 hour talk) before releasing the fraud. What they tried on here is insane.

The truth about 911 was a lesson about thinking objectively when it came to a confronting subject (false flag terror). Not many people carried this lesson over to the pandemic.

Story thanks to Trump is Right blog. 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 12, 2026.]

RECAP: Molten Steel in the Rubble of the World Trade Centre Collapse = Inside Job

The picture here shows superheated Molten Steel being pulled from the rubble of the World Trade Centre buildings weeks after the collapses.

We know this is steel because other materials such as copper or aluminium exhibiting a yellow or near white colour would be completely liquid. The melting point of copper is 1080 degrees Celsius whilst the melting point of aluminum is only 660 degrees Celsius. The metal in the picture is still plastic even though some of it is well above 1000 degrees Celsius.

You are looking at building steel that has been heated to an extraordinary temperature in a rubble pile that had neither the fuel or air requirements to do so. For instance in a forge, that heats iron to a red hot appearance, we require a sea of hot coals wherein the iron is submerged. Air is pumped into this mass to increase the temperature. The problem here is that the rubble pile was not a sea of coals and according to official reports, it presented conditions that were described as "oxygen poor"[US DELTA Study Group].

The ONLY other way of heating steel to such a high temperature here would necessarily require the use of large quantities of incendiary materials. The building fires could never cause such melting and neither could later conventional fires in the rubble pile.

The reports of superheated metals seen throughout the rubble must be taken seriously and the implications recognised. Just from this evidence alone it would appear that large sections of the World Trade Centre Buildings were subjected to the actions of incendiary devices.

Most damningly, analysis of the slag from the steel, and also from previously molten iron spheres (which were found all throughout the dust), has revealed the signature of the incendiary Thermate.[Use the Wayback Machine to view the link]

This smoking gun scientific evidence shows that the Twin Towers and Building 7 were subjected to large quantities of thermite-type incendiaries confirming that the collapses were not natural fire induced events. 911 was an Inside Job.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 12, 2026.]

RECAP: Evidence of Thermite - Dr. Steven Jones

Evidence of thermite in the World Trade Center debris.



This short 6 minute clip explains clearly the forensic signature of thermite in the World Trade Centre dust. The material that was examined had been heated until a liquid state (the spherical nature of the metal was caused due to surface tension). The metal spheres were not simply molten structural steel but the product of a thermitic reaction (see clip).

Importantly, the high number of metal spheres in the dust indicated that there MUST have been many tons of this stuff in the buildings. This metallic debris was a common feature of the WTC dust and is a certain proof that thermite was used in the demolition of the Twin Towers and Building 7 (along with high explosives most probably).

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 12, 2026.]

RECAP: Basic 911 Forensic Proofs: 9/11 Experiments - The Mysterious Eutectic (Melted) Steel

Did rubble from the WTC really cause those eutectic formations ,as we were led to believe?



Conventional fires, fuelled by office materials, will not melt steel and certainly not burn holes through steel beams. You need incendiaries or a blast furnace/blow torch environment with a high level of oxygen to generate sufficient heat to cause such damage.

A follow up experiment was done that showed how Thermite can cause the same effects as seen on the steel recovered from the 911 Crime Scene:

9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate  


And Thermite/Thermate cannot be created 'naturally' by the building contents (rusted steel) and aircraft aluminium. Creating a Thermitic mixture requires careful preparation and the correct ratio of elements, and even then the material is difficult to ignite. It is utterly ridiculous to suppose that many tons, or even pounds/kilograms of such a mixture could have been created in the building debris, yet Melted Steel was a feature of the rubble pile:

15 Ground Zero Part 1 Melted Steel Beams and Molten Iron - ESO - Experts Speak Out


In any forensic investigation such evidence of Melted Steel would be seen as proof of arson. In fact analysis of melted iron spheres taken from the debris proved that Thermite was the cause of the melting:

Evidence of Thermite - Dr. Steven Jones


In summary, it is very likely that the incendiaries used on the World Trade Centre buildings were either part of an effort to 'simulate' fire damage to the buildings (ie creating slow natural deformations at the aircraft impact points) and/or were used as a back up to the high explosives that rapidly brought down the structures (where the core columns in the basement areas could have been undermined). Regardless of how the Thermite was used, the evidence that it WAS used is irrefutable.

Related Info:

Some disinformation sites have pushed the idea that hot fire temperatures (in enclosed places) can catastrophically weaken steel (but certainly not cause Swiss cheese holes!) with fire temperatures of 600 degrees Celsius (1112 F) that causes a 60% loss in strength (yet the towers were built to carry five times their load, and the undamaged sections of the building were still near full strength). These sites do not tell the reader that the size and duration of any fire is important because steel beams require a significant amount of energy to heat up and deform (steel conducts heat very well so that localised fire temperatures do not lead to catastrophic heating).

Small intense fires will not cause deformations, and even large ones take time to heat a structure (this is why fire testing of steel structures are run over a number of hours rather than minutes). The fire temperature is not the same as the heat needed to weaken a steel beam or connection. This point is well explained in the following video:



According to NIST they could not find evidence of hot sustained fires in the WTC Towers. There was no sustained greater-than-600-degree-Celsius fire. There was no chimney effect, or enclosed space heating that might have raised the temperatures within a confined area (the aircraft gouged huge open holes in the sides of the buildings). Certainly the rubble pile could not be said to be an ideal fire environment - it was not a cauldron, or sea of coals, and there was no black smoke from a supposed intense conventional fire that would have burnt wood and plastic used in office furnishings - all we see is white smoke that is indicative of either steam or a thermitic reaction.

The problem the official story has is two fold - no evidence of hot conventional fires in the Towers or rubble pile, and damning evidence of an unconventional incendiary attack upon the steel structure.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 12, 2026.]

RECAP: 911 Truth: Architects and Engineers ~ Experts Speak Out

The mother of the War on Terror is the 911 False Flag Attack. The truth about this attack is the only thing that can end the conflict. The architects and engineers featured in this clip explain the physical evidence, the forensic proof, that CLEARLY shows the destruction of the World Trade Centre buildings involved inside help.

Please watch the documentary and reflect upon the endless conflict we continue to face. There are powerful, yet identifiable, forces at work within "the establishment" that set our world on course for perpetual war.

Related Info (who dun it):

911 and War by Deception


[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 11, 2026.]

RECAP: Basic 911 Forensic Proofs: Gordon Ross Master of Engineering Investigation into the Collapse of the WTC on 9/11

Master of Engineering, Gordon Ross presentation of his analysis of the destruction of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Centre on 11th September 2001.



The speaker here describes the damage to the steel structure found in the rubble pile that is accounted for by the use of explosives.

The features seen are not explained by a gravitational collapse. In the opening he pointed out that the debris expulsions during the 'collapses' do not occur on every floor, but every three floors, where the columns are welded together.

The video also points out that the key features of the damage done to the buildings involved steel columns that were accessible via the elevator shafts. Weaker columns, that were not directly accessible, could still be seen standing after the 'collapse fronts' had progressed downwards. The video clearly points out that the top sections of the Twin Towers didn't 'simply' crush the bottom section.

Most interesting is the concave damage done to the steel columns which indicate strong lateral forces were applied to these elements. This further makes sense when we consider that a large portion of the debris pile formed well outside tower footprints - the debris didn't simply 'fall' into the basement areas. These strong 'lateral' forces also pulverised the concrete floors to dust in mid air.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 11, 2026.]

Re: The Third Tower 1/2 (Anthony Lawson)

Another way of looking at what we've been told, and to learn to think for ourselves.



The famous, This is an Orange, video from Anthony Lawson that came out in 2007, looking at the demolition of Building 7 on the day of the 911 attacks. We actually have witnesses to explosions inside the building, that took out stairwells, occurring BEFORE any of the towers came down. This clip is about evaluating evidence for yourself, and not blindly believing in whatever the authorities tell you. A very valuable lesson.

Related:

Two Barry Jennings Interviews (WABC-TV, 2001 / LTW, 2007)


[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 11, 2026.]

One of the World's Deadliest Volcanoes Just Went Nuts...(Stafan Burns)

Starting on September 4th 2026 a major volcanic eruption hit Anak Krakatau (Krakatoa) Volcano in Indonesia, sending an ash plume at least 15 km (50,000 ft) above sea level into the stratosphere. If this volcanic eruption scales up to be even bigger, Indonesia and even the world could be in some big trouble. Geophysicist Stefan Burns reports...



The ash cloud will impact the global climate. After the 2022 Tonga eruption rainfall increased in certain locations around the world for a year. Another thing to consider is that the vast majority of volcanoes are underwater. What influence to they have on ocean temperatures and the global climate? 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 8, 2026.]

The Mysterious Discovery That Shows Humans Existed 476,000 Years Ago! – Michael Button (The Daily Heretic)

What if early humans were building complex structures nearly half a million years ago? In this fascinating and eye-opening conversation, Michael Button explores the discovery at Kalambo Falls and what it could reveal about the true capabilities of ancient humans.

Michael Button joins Andrew Gold to unpack one of the most intriguing archaeological discoveries in recent years: a 476,000-year-old wooden structure found at Kalambo Falls in Zambia. Why has this finding surprised so many researchers? And what does it suggest about early human intelligence?

In this focused discussion, Button explains the significance of the Kalambo structure—two interlocking logs, carefully shaped so that one fits securely into the other. This isn’t random assembly; it points to deliberate design and planning. But what does that mean for our understanding of early humans?

He explores the idea of cognitive ability. If humans—or human ancestors—were capable of constructing such structures hundreds of thousands of years ago, how advanced were they really? And does this discovery challenge long-held assumptions about when complex thinking emerged?

Button also reflects on how discoveries like this are interpreted. When new evidence pushes timelines further back, how does the academic world respond? And why do some findings take time to fully reshape established narratives?

Drawing on archaeological context, he highlights the rarity of preserved wooden structures from such an ancient period. Why is this discovery so unique? And what might have been lost to time that we simply haven’t found yet?

What makes this conversation particularly compelling is its focus on rethinking human origins. Button isn’t just presenting a discovery—he’s asking bigger questions about how we define intelligence, innovation, and progress.

He also touches on the broader implications. If early humans were capable of more than we thought, how might that change the way we view our own development as a species?

This interview stays tightly centred on one key idea: what the Kalambo Falls discovery reveals about the deep history of human ingenuity.

If you’re interested in archaeology, human evolution, and groundbreaking discoveries that challenge assumptions, this is a conversation that will expand your perspective.

Watch closely—because the past may be far more advanced than we ever imagined.



[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 5, 2026.]

'They're here' — a Harvard scientist on UFOs | Jesse Weber Live (News Nation)

If advanced civilizations exist in the universe, why haven’t they reached out to us? That’s the basic premise behind “The Fermi Paradox.” Theoretical physicist Avi Loeb joins “Jesse Weber Live” to discuss some possibilities. “We’re really ignorant about most of the constituents in the universe, including technologies well beyond what we have,” he says.



With all the UFO sightings, the obvious answer is that they are already here.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 4, 2026.]

I’m going to get banned for this video..(Asmongold)

Asmongold reacts to The Genetics Behind Unequal Societies from the Basic Logic channel.



The clip helps to explain why certain groups of people, but not necessarily all individuals, fail to get along with other groups of people. 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 3, 2026.]

Very strange white fibrous clots (John Campbell)

The study from Hungary shows the clots are not normal blood clots and are formed within living people. The are not post mortem phenomenon. 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 2, 2026.]

The 'dying reef' narrative is worth a LOT of money so how do we kill it? Topher Project Ep 466

What if the reef is NOT dying? What if the reef is, in fact, doing VERY well thankyou very much for asking?

But what if there are thousands of people who's livelihoods and careers DEPEND on you believing that the reef is desperately ill...

What would they be willing to do? Who would they be willing to destroy? What would they be willing to hide? And what if good, honest people found themselves working in an industry whose funding model is built on lies?

Prof Peter Ridd joins me on the Topher Project to discuss the remarkable GOOD news... coral cover on the reef is doing well, the doom-mongers are obviously wrong, and it's time to focus our energy and money onto real problems, not imaginary ones.



Best comment on You Tube:

@Gumbatron01
On top of cyclones, on longer time scales, the Great Barrier Reef endures extreme changes, over the last million years or so, the sea level has repeatedly risen and fallen around 200' around 10 times. The entire reef as it exists today was a series of hills along the coastline, or possibly a chain of small rocky islands merely 20000 years ago. With the start of the current interglacial period, sea levels rapidly (over the course of around 6k years) rose to near their current levels. In another 6k years, we might well be on the way to sea levels that are typical of the glacial phase of our current ice age. Even then, the reef will not die, it will move elsewhere and be resurrected again in another 80k years when the seas rise again.

Many thanks to Peter for his tireless efforts to get the truth about the Great Barrier Reef out.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 2, 2026.]

Vax letter to Prime Minister (John Campbell)

Dear Prime Minister,

Britain has spent six years arguing about the Covid pandemic. We do not believe the country needs another rehearsal of those arguments. But what it does need is answers.

We are a group of (x number) doctors, scientists health professionals and public figures asking you to do something your predecessors have repeatedly failed to do: commission an independent examination of outstanding questions about the safety of Covid-19 vaccines and ensure that those who believe they have been injured or bereaved are properly heard.

We are not asking you to accept our conclusions.

We are asking you to ensure that the evidence is examined.

That distinction matters.

You have spoken powerfully about what happens when institutions become defensive and difficult questions are left unanswered. Britain has seen the consequences in Hillsborough, the infected blood scandal and the Post Office scandal. In each case, people raising concerns were dismissed for years before institutions were eventually forced to confront what had happened.

Whatever your own view of Covid vaccination, we ask you to ensure that the same mistake is not made again.

There remain legitimate and unresolved questions about adverse events following Covid vaccination, including cardiovascular events; increases in cancer, the causes of excess mortality and increased long-term sickness since the pandemic; the adequacy of systems for identifying vaccine injury; and whether those who believe they have suffered serious harm have been adequately investigated and supported.

We recognise that excess mortality and ill health are likely to have multiple causes, including delayed NHS treatment, the effects of lockdown, Covid infection itself and wider pressures on the health service.

But we believe vaccination must also be permitted to form part of that investigation rather than being treated as a question that cannot be asked. This is ultimately an issue of public trust.

Four of the lead signatories to this letter were asked by Baroness Hallett's UK Covid-19 Inquiry to provide witness statements for Module 4 on vaccines and therapeutics.

Those statements were submitted in January 2024.

We were deeply disappointed by what we regarded as the Inquiry's failure to examine the full body of evidence and arguments we had submitted concerning vaccine safety and efficacy.

Whatever one's view of that evidence, inviting doctors and scientists to provide testimony and then failing adequately to engage with contested evidence does little to restore confidence among those who already believe their concerns are being ignored.

We therefore ask your government to support a full and transparent examination of the outstanding evidence.

These questions have not disappeared.

They are increasingly being debated internationally and has now reached the United States Senate

Earlier this year, three of the signatories travelled to Washington to testify before a United States Senate subcommittee examining concerns surrounding Covid vaccination and scientific research into potential harms.

Our testimonies raised a wider issue which we believe deserves serious political attention in Britain: the influence of the pharmaceutical industry over medical research, regulation and public health policy. Even our own APPG on pandemic response and recovery in 2024 concluded that the MHRA is a serious risk to patient safety for failing to flag serious harms from the Covid vaccine.

The pharmaceutical industry produces medicines that save millions of lives. But precisely because governments spend billions purchasing its products and depend upon its research, the relationship between industry, regulators, medical institutions and government must be transparent and subject to rigorous scrutiny.

No industry responsible for products affecting the health of billions of people should be beyond challenge.

Nor should doctors or scientists fear professional or reputational consequences simply for raising legitimate questions about safety. There is another group whose voices should not be lost in the political argument: people who believe they have been seriously injured by Covid vaccines and families who believe they have been bereaved.

Some adverse effects of Covid vaccines are already officially recognised.

The question is whether Britain's mechanisms for identifying, investigating and compensating serious vaccine injury are adequate - and whether every credible safety signal has been investigated with sufficient independence and urgency. As one of the signatories to this letter states under oath in the United States senate in June his fears that millions of people may be at risk of premature heart disease and cancer.



Excellent interview with Dr Malhotra concerning the recent letter to the UK PM. Dr Malhotra reports that many powerful people are STILL afraid to speak out against the shots because of supposed negative public relations and reaction from the authorities. He says that understanding the truth for many has nothing to do with intelligence but one's psychology and lack of courage, and that what's going on is like living in The Twilight Zone. He reiterated the fact that in the initial trials more people became sick from the jabs than Covid. There's no reason they should have been approved for the general public.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, August 31, 2026.]