Lindsay Clancy Jurors Make Fools of Themselves - Lawyer Reacts to the Post-Mistrial Interviews! (Viva Frei)

The key thing we need next is the perspective of the holdout juror. It's very likely that the 11 other jurors had not understood the instructions from the judge and pushed the idea that Lindsay Clancy was insane at the time of the murder, despite the fact the evidence showed it was pre-planned.

Some of the other jurors originally sided with the holdout, but changed their minds. Was this done under peer group pressure rather than from the facts as presented? Slightly more information is needed to better understand what happened. 

There should at least be a new trial because the case was merely to judge whether the defendant should be sent to a mental hospital, which would allow for a later release, or prison. The trial did not question the fact that Lindsay killed her own kids. 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, September 13, 2026.]