Israel Is the REASON The U.S. Allows Dual Citizenship (Kim Iversen)

Should Congress ban citizens of foreign countries from voting in American elections? And is anyone surprised that it was an Israeli at the heart of the Supreme Court decision (1967) to allow Americans to hold citizenship in other countries?



The clip mentions the 14th Amendment where citizenship was determined by not having any other alliance to another country. People who fell under the jurisdiction of the United States, according the argument of this video, were not supposed to have a dual allegiance. When it comes to the anchor baby issue, the parents of the child would not fall under the jurisdiction of the country, and then neither should the child. They are responsible for it.
The question then is, does the dual citizenship ruling in 1967 mean that any foreigner entering the country automatically fall under US jurisdiction, and it therefore applies to their child? While they may have to follow US law, does this then grant them or their possession, the child, automatic citizenship and all the benefits this confers? It should not necessarily follow that that is the case. Under the original intent of the law there would be no grounds for any anchor baby to be granted citizenship. The whole idea is insane too, and it should be struck out. 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, July 6, 2026.]