Independent Media Is INFILTRATED — The Only Question Is WHO? (Kim Iversen)

Veteran researcher and author Donald Jeffries joins Kim for a wide-ranging conversation that starts with the Iran war restarting for the "39th time" and the one question Trump can't seem to answer: why not just go home? From there they dig into the anti-Zionist movement and the question hanging over independent media — with a long history of intelligence agencies infiltrating movements, it's not a matter of if*, it's a matter of *who*. They explore the speculation around Tucker Carlson and others, why RFK Jr. remains rabidly Zionist despite everything, and how the JFK and RFK assassinations may tie in. Then it's on to the Tyler Robinson case: the impossible one-minute rooftop timeline, the Mauser reassembly problem, the second bullet that was never preserved, reports of three people in the car, and the surgeon conversation that apparently never happened. Donald Jeffries is the author of 10 best-selling books, including *Hidden History and *American Memory Hole*, and is a Substack Bestseller. His work has been lauded by the likes of Ron Paul, Naomi Wolf, Roger Stone, Cindy Sheehan, Cynthia McKinney, and Jesse Ventura.



This is an old problem, of having a controlled opposition. The way to counter the disinformation operatives, and also the unhinged/uninformed, is to dump anyone that betrays core principles. We all want transparency and justice. Moves to steer people away from that direction should be seen as suspect.

If an independent media person questions a clear point of evidence with false arguments, that don't make sense, they should be dumped, or at least considered as a highly problematic source.

Using logic and reason, we should be at the point where every solid alt media person should be on the same page. You can make some allowances for how far people might go in covering certain issues, but when they try to steer the ship of truthseeking into rocks then they are either plants or unhinged/uniformed. Logic and Reason, and drilling down into primary source information, should be your way of sorting things out.
Think about this in the same way you might apply the scientific method - where complete transparency is needed. The audience should have access to all documented material, and be able to see how your conclusions were rationally formed.  

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, July 12, 2026.]