Seventeen years after he forced NIST to backtrack on its false claim that Building 7 did not come down in free fall, retired physics teacher David Chandler has produced yet another measurement that blows the NIST World Trade Center investigation out of the water.
This time around, Chandler has taken aim at NIST’s unproven assertion that the vertical drop of the North Tower’s antenna, which began a half-second prior to the downward motion of the building, was merely an illusion caused by the top of the building along with the antenna tipping southward as the exterior columns on the south face allegedly gave way before the rest of the structure.
In his recent paper in the Journal of 9/11 Studies (https://ic911.org/journal/articles/th..., Chandler proves that the antenna did indeed experience a vertical drop prior to any significant tipping, which must have been caused by the simultaneous failure of all of the core columns prior to the failure of any exterior columns. This finding invalidates NIST’s scenario that the collapse of the North Tower initiated along its south face. It also solidifies yet another piece of evidence for controlled demolition.
In this episode of IC911’s new podcast, IC911 Executive Director Ted Walter speaks with Chandler and civil engineer Jonathan Cole about the significance of Chandler’s new paper.
The analysis here, along with many other analyses of the building 'collapses' on 911, proves the official story is a lie. The core of the building failed first.
Related info:
Although slightly damaged by debris, WTC Building 7 held firm, but then collapsed in free fall later in the day. We know, from witnesses, that there were 'bombs' going off in the building earlier in the day before the towers collapses and caused the damage mentioned earlier.
This attacked kicked off the War on Terror and helped accelerate the corruption of our world. If justice had been served here a lot of the bad stuff we see today would likely not have happened.
Architects and Engineers: Solving the Mystery of Building 7 - w/ Ed Asner
[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, April 9, 2025.]
No comments:
Post a Comment