Chairman and Spokesperson for the Trumpet of Patriots addresses key campaign plans and policies ahead of the 2025 Australian election. Topics discussed include the party's aim to offer bold leadership and solutions for Australia's common issues like housing, cost of living, and national security. Clive discusses policies to stimulate economic growth, and criticisms against current government actions by Labor and the Liberal parties. The session concludes with questions from the press regarding the party's strategies and political challenges. Clive also discusses upcoming events with Suellen Wrightson, Tucker Carlson, Dinesh D'Souza and Senator Ralph Babet
00:00 Introduction and Acknowledgements
00:25 Trumpet of Patriots: Vision and Policies
00:44 Upcoming Events and Key Supporters
01:59 Critique of Current Political Landscape
03:09 Party's Main Policies and Goals
03:32 Call for New Ideas and Leadership
03:49 Membership Growth and Public Sentiment
05:00 Unity and Equality for All Australians
05:47 Economic Mismanagement and Immigration Issues
07:48 Government Waste and Corruption
16:05 Energy and Housing Solutions
25:59 Conclusion and Final Thoughts
35:18 Discussion on Trump Team Support
35:57 Critique of Kevin Rudd and Trump
37:47 Election Spending and Vaccine Criticism
40:00 Leadership of the Liberal Party
43:43 Tariffs and Australian Industry
Editor's comment:
I wrote to Clive Palmer about a winning election strategy in order to kick out the majors, which follows below. The focus was on the energy side of things, to cut power bills. I should have also added that recently issued, post Covid, visas should be revoked, most of them, to reverse the flow of migrants rather than just suggesting a cut back in immigration:
I’m writing from Melbourne, and my representative is Senator Babet, whom I voted for. I’ll address the election marketing issue first.
Winning the election through Economic policy:
I believe it’s vitally important for the UAP, and other minor parties, to win the balance of power in the next election in order to save our wrecked domestic economy and put an end to the mRNA jab madness. The major parties both avoid obvious solutions to our economic problems, so the only obstacle in sending them packing is articulating a viable way forward to the public.
Solving the high cost of energy is the key to victory. It should be the central pillar of any election campaign. The quickest and easiest way to lower people’s power bills, that would also help industry, is to build new coal fired power stations at the same locations as the existing ones. In the election you could state the costs for the new stations and that they would be built within 3 years so that people’s power bills would be cut in half or greater.
Furthermore, the promotion of coal should come with a rebuttal to the climate change scammers too. You can point out that it’s already too late to supposedly ‘save the planet’ since the output of Asian countries is going to smash through any CO2 restrictions we have in the West. Moreover, there’s no indication that our CO2 output is impacting temperature in the way that’s been claimed, despite all the modelling and theoretical work that has been done. Arctic and Antarctic sea ice is not in decline, sea level rise is not accelerating, snowfall is not a thing of the past etc. The warming we are seeing comes from data tampering - making the charts show warming when there is none, or very little. And this is ignoring the fact that we recently went through a Mini Ice Age and the Medieval Warming Period where temperatures varied significantly independent of CO2 levels.
When you have competing hypotheses in science the final arbiter of truth is experiment or direct observation. The claims made by those fearmongering about CO2 and temperature is refuted by the data.
You can also promote nuclear energy too, but you should indicate a preference to wait until thorium technology is developed - a tech that prevents catastrophic melt downs. The fact is that people are afraid of nuclear disasters, and they have concerns about what to do with the nuclear waste. The thorium technology essentially solves those issues.
However, the key thing with the energy policy is to give people a price target on their power bills with the new build coal plants. The construction could be a public/private enterprise – one that is carefully managed where you’d run the project like you’d build a mine, via a definitive feasibility study (DFS), and pick an off-the-shelf design.
The other thing to help with energy costs would be to modify the contracts of the gas producers on the East Coast to put them more in line with the West Coast gas deal, where a portion of gas has to be reserved for the domestic market. Gas companies on the East Coast should be given some sort of compensatory deal for the modification of their contracts.
You could then promise the people on the East Coast that their gas prices will fall dramatically within one year of this policy being enacted.
Voters would be eyeing reduced electricity and gas costs. Industrial activity would also become a viable proposition once again, and the same for small businesses.
Inflation would fall.
A second tier policy, relating to energy, should be the promotion/establishment/expansion of domestic oil production and refinement.
The other non-energy aspect to making life more affordable in Australia is to cut immigration levels. Other minor parties are pushing this idea, and it would stop property price inflation with lessened demand. You could simply add to the chorus of the other minor parties, but not harp on about it as much as your energy policy.
If you really push this energy policy plan, with costed estimates for cheap power bills, you should win the balance of power, especially if the other minor parties come on board and support the exact same policy - where they could amplify the message. Building mines, or coal fired stations, is in your ball park, so you’d be leading the pack when it came to this area.
Once the balance of power is gained further action can be taken against the dangerous mRNA technology that is killing thousands of people. As you know this tech must be banned. Thank you for standing up during Covid and trying to help people with that Hydroxychloroquine purchase that was heinously denied to the public. Like yourself I refused to take any of the experimental shots, and find it difficult to accept that so many went along with the jab mandates.
[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, March 19, 2025.]
Solving the high cost of energy is the key to victory. It should be the central pillar of any election campaign. The quickest and easiest way to lower people’s power bills, that would also help industry, is to build new coal fired power stations at the same locations as the existing ones. In the election you could state the costs for the new stations and that they would be built within 3 years so that people’s power bills would be cut in half or greater.
Furthermore, the promotion of coal should come with a rebuttal to the climate change scammers too. You can point out that it’s already too late to supposedly ‘save the planet’ since the output of Asian countries is going to smash through any CO2 restrictions we have in the West. Moreover, there’s no indication that our CO2 output is impacting temperature in the way that’s been claimed, despite all the modelling and theoretical work that has been done. Arctic and Antarctic sea ice is not in decline, sea level rise is not accelerating, snowfall is not a thing of the past etc. The warming we are seeing comes from data tampering - making the charts show warming when there is none, or very little. And this is ignoring the fact that we recently went through a Mini Ice Age and the Medieval Warming Period where temperatures varied significantly independent of CO2 levels.
When you have competing hypotheses in science the final arbiter of truth is experiment or direct observation. The claims made by those fearmongering about CO2 and temperature is refuted by the data.
You can also promote nuclear energy too, but you should indicate a preference to wait until thorium technology is developed - a tech that prevents catastrophic melt downs. The fact is that people are afraid of nuclear disasters, and they have concerns about what to do with the nuclear waste. The thorium technology essentially solves those issues.
However, the key thing with the energy policy is to give people a price target on their power bills with the new build coal plants. The construction could be a public/private enterprise – one that is carefully managed where you’d run the project like you’d build a mine, via a definitive feasibility study (DFS), and pick an off-the-shelf design.
The other thing to help with energy costs would be to modify the contracts of the gas producers on the East Coast to put them more in line with the West Coast gas deal, where a portion of gas has to be reserved for the domestic market. Gas companies on the East Coast should be given some sort of compensatory deal for the modification of their contracts.
You could then promise the people on the East Coast that their gas prices will fall dramatically within one year of this policy being enacted.
Voters would be eyeing reduced electricity and gas costs. Industrial activity would also become a viable proposition once again, and the same for small businesses.
Inflation would fall.
A second tier policy, relating to energy, should be the promotion/establishment/expansion of domestic oil production and refinement.
The other non-energy aspect to making life more affordable in Australia is to cut immigration levels. Other minor parties are pushing this idea, and it would stop property price inflation with lessened demand. You could simply add to the chorus of the other minor parties, but not harp on about it as much as your energy policy.
If you really push this energy policy plan, with costed estimates for cheap power bills, you should win the balance of power, especially if the other minor parties come on board and support the exact same policy - where they could amplify the message. Building mines, or coal fired stations, is in your ball park, so you’d be leading the pack when it came to this area.
Once the balance of power is gained further action can be taken against the dangerous mRNA technology that is killing thousands of people. As you know this tech must be banned. Thank you for standing up during Covid and trying to help people with that Hydroxychloroquine purchase that was heinously denied to the public. Like yourself I refused to take any of the experimental shots, and find it difficult to accept that so many went along with the jab mandates.
[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, March 19, 2025.]
No comments:
Post a Comment