Fake Graphs And Maps (Tony Heller)

Climate alarmism is built on a foundation of fake and misleading graphs and maps, which are then further misinterpreted to push a political agenda that has nothing to do with reality.



This short video covers cooked tide gauge data and global temp data. The fraud is very straightforward. One would have thought something so straightforward would have sunk the whole scam, but things don't work that way. Unfortunately people's minds work via a psychological attachment to whatever the authorities declare and what the MSM says is true. The details don't seem to matter.

The only time the details seem to matter is when the authorities tell you they matter. This is true for almost every major issue, from the proxy wars overseas, to the pandemic (most heinously), and this issue. This content is posted for those with genuinely inquiring minds, as opposed to selectively inquiring minds. All you have to do is check out one or two of these sorts of clips to realise what is going on.

Additional comment:

You can work things out for yourself. Experts do this all the time. The key thing people misunderstand about the process being relayed here is that the people making the criticisms are also experts. It's a case of expert vs expert. It's not just some bum saying "naaah, this is crap, I know better."

What you are treated to here is expert analysis. If you do the work you can engage in such an activity too, but the experience helps.

This is true with other issues. The tragedy is that people frame these sorts of criticisms as coming from 'unqualified' people. What the critics are doing is using their expertise to point out key concepts and primary source data/research that refutes what the authorities are telling you. In the end, science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts. What is important is the data and argument.

When you have a situation that appears to be one of expert vs expert the final arbiter of truth is experiment, or direct primary source observation, which is related to experiment.

This is all fundamental stuff. The authorities should be openly debating such critiques but what happens is (journal and online) censorship, and the cutting off of funding, for academics openly questioning the climate crisis narrative. This is not how science is supposed to work. It's a red flag for a political operation. It's also not an uncommon thing.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, February 13, 2024.]