Bigfoot Proof: 3 Ironclad Reasons the Patterson-Gimlin Film is Real (Cabin in the Woods)

The Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot film has stirred up debate for nearly 60 years — was it a hoax, or did it actually capture a real Sasquatch walking through the woods of Bluff Creek in 1967? In this video, I take a closer look at three often-overlooked details that make the “man in a suit” theory almost impossible to believe.

Drawing on the work of Hollywood effects artist Bill Munns, we explore some very specific anatomical features — the shape of the head, the lack of a visible neck, and the way the shoulders and arms move — that don’t match anything ever created for a costume, then or now. Along the way, I also address some of the most common skeptical claims: zippers, boots, confessions, and more.
I’ve been deeply involved in Bigfoot research for years, especially since my own sighting in 2024. The more I dig into this film, the more convinced I am that it deserves to be taken seriously — and that a lot of the so-called “debunks” fall apart under real scrutiny.

Whether you’re a believer, a skeptic, or somewhere in between, these are details worth considering.



[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, June 17, 2025.]