Cancer cure experiences [using Fenbendazole and Ivermectin] - John Campbell

Viewers share their experiences of their approaches to cancer treatment.



These are anecdotal accounts from people who have successfully treated cancer using Fenbendazole and Ivermectin on themselves and their pets. The key thing to understand about these reports, and anecdotal evidence, is that this IS evidence (they should be considered raw reports). This is how we begin when it comes to forming hard scientifically verified data. Too often anecdotal evidence is dismissed by officious stiffs but it should be seen in the same way we make observations in the natural environment, where we can then go further and conduct further tests.

We should also consider a similar situation when it comes to the idea that correlation does not not equal causation. Many people have been taken in by this wrongly applied notion.

While it is true that correlation does not NECESSARILY mean causation it very OFTEN is a strong indicator of a causal mechanism. One should not wave away things that are right in front of one's face with the idea that one thing is not leading to another until we have proof. We must be open to the idea that there may, in fact, be a causal mechanism.

In medicine, when we follow the precautionary principle, whilst conducting experiments and their potential harms, we should be assuming a causal link if something appears to be unsafe - until it is proven otherwise. In an experiment the onus of proof is reversed.

So we have two things here. Being open to anecdotal evidence that likely shows a causal link, and for the purposes of safety, assuming a causal link if harms are indicated in an experiment - until proven otherwise. It's logical. 

Another key thing about people (and animals) suffering life ending conditions is their right to try anything they want to see what happens.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, November 27, 2024.]