9/11: The Devil's in the details (physicsandreason)

YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issues using the scientific method. To find the truth, study the details.



The details talked about in this clip are not trivial. The 911 details represent confirmed measurements that are not contested when it comes to the destruction of the buildings in NYC. The video reminds viewers that we encountered the exact same situation when we go back in history when it comes to analysis of the relationship of the Sun to the Earth. For thousands of years significant details were ignored, or incorrectly explained away, so that the facts would 'fit' preconceived ideas that the Earth was the centre of the universe. To a rational mind the ignoring of observed details that don't agree with your theory is a travesty.

When we take into account the details surrounding the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 on 911 we know that the official account of what happened is necessarily false. Either the official account is false or basic scientific principles are in error. It's very straightforward unless you have a problem when it comes to taking in information that is right in front of your face - something that is all too common when the authorities trot out a narrative. For those captivated by authority it does not matter what the science tells you. The only thing that seems to matter is what authority says, something that is often buttressed by disinformation and fudging put out by various trolls and official toadies, that many 'intellectually minded' people, who are not usually very wise, lap up. This video is about thinking clearly when it comes to observed phenomena.

Editor's notes:

These are lessons from more than ten years ago. They're reminders for me about things I learnt in the early 90s. Maybe around 93. The phrase that comes to mind from the 90s is: "It can't be, therefore it isn't!" - when it comes to describing people who are ignoring good or strong evidence. It comes down to psychology.

The book I am quoting from was written by an astronomer, Dr J Allen Hynek, about the study of UFO reports. He was looking at the US Airforce Blue Book files and, other reports, and how very credible information was blatantly being ignored.

This has nothing to do with willy nilly believing anything that comes across your plate. This has to do with evaluating evidence using rational and scientific principles. Evidence evaluation/measurements comes first and conclusions second. Preconceived ideas must be dialed down. The question is, what does the evidence tell me?

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, May 19, 2024.]