Anna gives a fascinating interview from a lawyer's perspective about the conditions stated in the Law of Armed Conflict that constitute a war and have been enacted globally. The requirements for a safe jab are also laid out methodically and the failure to adhere to these rules is discussed.
Dr's Malhotra and Campbell, social engineering and the media are also discussed and Anna doesn't hold back in her condemnation of this attack on humanity.
I conducted this interview on behalf of the mid Sussex Assembly and Stand Together at their event in Burgess Hill. The event was to raise money for their court cases against the BBC, Facebook, the government and a care home. Please learn more about their work at their website below.
http://www.actuk.co.uk/ . Original source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/BGwn3Va7Aamg/
Anna de Buisseret worked as an independent analyst for Pfizer and has been a strong advocate against this medical crime against humanity (the jab mandates). She's ex military and a real deal patriot when it comes to standing up for human rights and personal/national sovereignty. The key point she is raising is that our Governments and professional class have gone rogue and are acting lawlessly against the general public - that what's happened is tantamount to a war against the people.
The video opens with Anna explaining that few people in professional positions don't understand the regulations and laws under which they are supposed to work. Most professional people, including doctors, have no clue beyond 'what they think the law is' which is often wrong.
She points out that people like Dr Malhotra and Dr Campbell should have known that their pro jab advice was wrong at the time, where they have since changed their minds. She explains that there were clear warnings about the lack of safety BEFORE any of these shots were rolled out, material she could understand, and this was blindly IGNORED, or not understood, by medical professionals. In this situation there is no way ANY doctor could tell their patients that the jabs were safe. And so they've fallen foul of the law.
Many people who protested against the mandates carried with them warnings about the experimental concoctions. Key dissenting doctors and medical researchers, who were part of the online protest movement, like Dr Bhakdi and Dr Yeadon, were sidelined and ignored, which was disgraceful. The slur anti vaxxer was widely used.
The bottom line is that the warnings were there and they were clear. Basic procedures were ignored in favour of following whatever protocols and assurances the authorities put forth. No real investigation, or due diligence, by pro jab doctors was done in the face of all the dissent, which makes them liable. They were advocating for something that had not undergone proper safety testing and called it safe.
What we have witnessed is the biggest crime against humanity the world has ever known.
[Posted at the
SpookyWeather2 blog, December 27, 2023.]
No comments:
Post a Comment