Today James demonstrates the proper way to formulate a question about someone's research if you want to get a useful answer. And, as an added bonus, you'll learn how the UNFCCC was rigged from the outset and how the much-ballyhooed IPCC report is nothing but a negotiated political document!
Massive corruption where the frame of reference for the IPCC was politically driven, and where the conclusions were determined first, and the report and studies written to prove up a set narrative. Their frames of reference eliminated investigation of non-human drivers of climate. It was assumed that human activity was driving things. The clip shows links to the official UNFCCC document where this structure was set up.
This situation makes sense of the two main sets of temperate data we see in the world. We have ACTUAL readings and then the charts that get published which are the adjusted temperatures. The adjustments, or lack of adjustments, take into account all the modeling and assumptions that are based on a political consensus, not a scientifically derived position. It's why we see hot temperatures in the past being excluded, heat island effects not accounted for correctly, downwards cooling adjustments made to the historical data based on false time of day alterations etc etc. All of these things create a fake ever upwards warming chart which is not accurate. It's crooked. It's as conformist and crooked, or bereft of thought, as the recent Cov id mandate activity/conformity. Reality runs a poor second and the robot zombies just follow whatever authority says is the right answer.
Throughout the latter part of the 20th century and into the 21st century a similar pattern repeats again and again in official reports, where the conclusion is decided first and everything follows along afterwards, with contrary evidence and dissenting opinions excluded. It's political and corrupt. Anyone can work this out if they simply look with an open mind.
[Posted at the
SpookyWeather2 blog, February 22, 2023.]
No comments:
Post a Comment