People Have Doubted Election Results Since 2000! Says Chris Christie (Jimmy Dore)

The reason there's been an increase in questioning election results is because of fraud. While there were questions with the Florida vote in the 2000 Presidential election, there is strong evidence to show the 2004 election was rigged. Exit Polls, that are no longer done, showed the vote was rigged (see the Related Info link below). People were puzzled by his reelection and the mainstream media obfuscated information that showed the vote was rigged. Fast forward to 2016 and Hillary, expecting to win, then accuses Trump of rigging the vote when there is no evidence to support this whereas there is some evidence that her own team had engaged in limited manipulations in a few big centres. In 2020 the vote rigging against Trump was obvious to everyone, and hence the legitimate protests at the Capitol Building. The issue that riled people so much is that no proper audits of the suspect counts occurred.  

The truth of the situation in the USA is that vote rigging is now a common method to support the Globalist/neocon candidate unless it's unneeded - where both candidates are thoroughly under control. In the context of rigged or attempted rigging of elections one must remember that Bush, Hillary, and Biden are all on the same Globalist/neocon team. Note: Obama didn't need any help because he was popular.

The following clip shows how easy it is to hack electronic voting machines, from the documentary Hacking Democracy:

Hacking Democracy - The Hack (2006):


This second video provides the key point of evidence in relation to the 2020 election which shows clear evidence of industrial scale ballot stuffing. Other techniques were used in 2020, like running the same ballots multiple times through counting machines, which is what happened in Georgia, and perhaps machine manipulation. The fact that no proper audits were conducted reeks of a cover-up. Consequently the election result in such a contested situation should never have been ratified. The right thing to do would have been to conduct an open forensic audit and this was denied. No wonder people were angry:

2000 MULES - FULL DOCUMENTARY


Related Info:

No Paper Trail Left Behind: the Theft of the 2004 Presidential Election* By Dennis Loo, Ph.D

“Alice laughed: “There’s no use trying,” she said; “one can’t believe impossible things.” “I daresay you haven’t had much practice,” said the Queen. “When I was younger, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.” (Through the Looking Glass)

In order to believe that George Bush won the November 2, 2004 presidential election, you must also believe all of the following extremely improbable or outright impossible things.1

1) A big turnout and a highly energized and motivated electorate favored the GOP instead of the Democrats for the first time in history.2

2) Even though first-time voters, lapsed voters (those who didn’t vote in 2000), and undecideds went for John Kerry by big margins, and Bush lost people who voted for him in the cliffhanger 2000 election, Bush still received a 3.4 million vote surplus nationally.3

3) The fact that Bush far exceeded the 85% of registered Florida Republicans’ votes that he got in 2000, receiving in 2004 more than 100% of the registered Republican votes in 24 out of 67 Florida counties, more than 200% of registered Republicans in 10 counties, over 300% of registered Republicans in 4 counties, more than 400% of Registered Republicans in 4 counties, and over 700% in one county. This could only be explained by a massive crossover vote in these specific counties by registered Democrats and/or Independents. Bush’s share of crossover votes by registerd Democrats in Florida, however, did not actually increase over 2000 and he lost ground among registered Independents, dropping 15 points. Floridians were just so enthused about Bush and Cheney that they somehow managed to overrule basic math.4

4) The fact that Bush got more votes than registered voters, and the fact that by stark contrast participation rates in many Democratic strongholds in Ohio and Florida fell to as low as less than 8%, do not indicate a rigged election.5

5)Bush won re-election despite approval ratings below 50% – the first time in history this has happened. Harry Truman has been cited as having also done this, but Truman’s polling numbers were trailing so much behind his challenger, Thomas Dewey, pollsters stopped surveying two weeks before the 1948 elections, thus missing the late surge of support for Truman. Unlike Truman, Bush’s support was clearly eroding on the eve of the election.6

6) Harris’ and Zogby’s last-minute polling indicating a Kerry victory was wrong (even though Harris and Zogby were exactly on the mark in their 2000 election final polls).7

7) The “challenger rule” – an incumbent’s final results won’t be better than his final polling – was wrong;8

8) On election day the early-day voters picked up by early exit polls (showing Kerry with a wide lead) were heavily Democratic instead of the traditional pattern of early voters being mainly Republican.

9) The fact that Bush “won” Ohio by 51-48%, but this was not matched by the court-supervised hand count of the 147,400 absentee and provisional ballots in which Kerry received 54.46% of the vote doesn’t cast any suspicion upon the official tally.9

10) Florida computer programmer Clinton Curtis (a life-long registered Republican) must be lying when he said in a sworn affidavit that his employers at Yang Enterprises, Inc. (YEI) and Tom Feeney (general counsel and lobbyist for YEI, GOP state legislator and Jeb Bush’s 1994 running mate for Florida Lt. Governor) asked him in 2000 to create a computer program to undetectably alter vote totals. Curtis, under the initial impression that he was creating this software in order to forestall possible fraud, handed over the program to his employer Mrs. Li Woan Yang, and was told: “You don’t understand, in order to get the contract we have to hide the manipulation in the source code. This program is needed to control the vote in south Florida.” (Boldface in original).10

11) Diebold CEO Walden O’Dell’s declaration in a August 14, 2003 letter to GOP fundraisers that he was “committed to helping Ohio to deliver its electoral votes to the president next year” and the fact that Diebold is one of the three major suppliers of the electronic voting machines in Ohio and nationally, didn’t result in any fraud by Diebold.

12) There was no fraud in Warren County, Ohio where they admitted counting the votes in secret before bringing them out in public to count, citing an unidentified FBI agent’s warning of a terrorist incident as the rationale, a report that the FBI denies ever making.

13) CNN reported at 9 p.m. EST on election evening that Kerry was leading by 3 points in the national exit polls based on well over 13,000 respondents. Several hours later at 1:36 a.m. CNN reported that the exit polls, now based on a few hundred more – 13,531 respondents – were showing Bush leading by 2 points, a 5-point swing. In other words, a swing of 5 percentage points from a tiny increase in the number of respondents somehow occurred despite it being mathematically impossible.11

14) Exit polls in the November 2004 Ukrainian presidential elections, paid for in part by the Bush administration, were right, but exit polls in the U.S., where exit polling was invented, were very wrong.12

15) The National Election Pool’s exit polls13 were so far off that since their inception twenty years ago, they have never been this wrong, more wrong than statistical probability indicates is possible.

16) In every single instance where exit polls were wrong the discrepancy favored Bush, even though statistical probability tells us that any survey errors should show up in both directions. Half a century of polling and centuries of mathematics must be wrong.
https://www.projectcensored.org/voter-fraud-august-2005/

[Posted at the SpookyWeather2 blog, July 2, 2022.]